Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes (Rose)

Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 200900123, first issued in 2009. The licence is now expired.

Licence number

200900123

Licence status

Expired

Licence type

Full

First licensed

2009

Licence last issued

26 February 2014

Location

Auckland, New Zealand

Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.

Register context

Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.

• One of 802 currently licensed advisers based in Auckland.
• The register records 6 filings for this licence between 26 February 2009 and 26 February 2014.

Licence history

Every filing recorded on the register for licence 200900123, newest first.

1. Full licence - Renewal · 26 February 2014
2. Full licence - Renewal · 26 February 2013
3. Full licence - Renewal · 26 February 2012
4. Full licence - Renewal · 26 February 2011
5. Full licence - Renewal · 26 February 2010
6. Full licence - Initial application · 26 February 2009

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions

Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — read each outcome; some complaints are dismissed.

• [2017] NZIACDT 16 — Casas v Navarette-Scholes20 September 2017
• [2017] NZIACDT 15 — Kho v Navarette-Scholes20 September 2017
• [2016] NZIACDT 60 — Kho v Navarette-Scholes22 September 2016
• [2016] NZIACDT 33 — Casas v Navarette-Scholes28 June 2016
• [2015] NZIACDT 112 — Carley (INZ) v Navarette-Scholes24 December 2015
• [2015] NZIACDT 111 — Ly v Navarette-Scholes24 December 2015
• [2015] NZIACDT 46 — Ly v Navarette-Scholes29 April 2015
• [2015] NZIACDT 42 — Carley (INZ) v Navarette-Scholes20 April 2015
• [2015] NZIACDT 16 — Ly v Navarette-Scholes6 March 2015
• [2013] NZIACDT 71 — MSC v Scholes25 November 2013
• [2013] NZIACDT 58 — MSC v Scholes10 September 2013

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

1 published decision of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

• [2012] NZIPT 200759Residence: skilled migrant · 26 October 2012No jurisdiction

This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.

Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.