A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2016] NZIACDT 33 |
| Parties | Casas v Navarette-Scholes |
| Decided | 28 June 2016 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes, licence 200900123, expired |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Complaint upheld”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Rosemarie Navarette-Scholes (licence 200900123, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.