This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

PPI letters from Immigration New Zealand - how to respond

A letter from Immigration New Zealand saying it holds information that may adversely affect your application is not a decline: it is your legal opportunity to change the outcome. INZ's fairness instructions require applicants to be given the chance to comment before a decision is made on potentially prejudicial information: instruction E7.15 for temporary visas, R5.20.5 for residence. The letter must identify which instruction INZ considers unmet and why, and it states your response deadline. What you send back, and how completely you deal with each concern, usually decides the application.

Updated 12 August 2026

The PPI process at a glance

  1. INZ holds adverse informationFrom your file, a check or a third party

    Factual information or material that will or may adversely affect the outcome of your application.

  2. The PPI letterBefore a decision is made

    It should identify which instruction the officer considers has not been met, how, and what the outcome may be, and it states your deadline.

  3. Your responseBy the deadline in the letter

    Deal with every concern, one by one, with evidence. Ask early and in writing if you need an extension.

  4. The decisionOn everything before the officer

    A complete, evidenced response can change the outcome. An unanswered concern becomes a finding.

From adverse information to a decision
  1. INZ holds adverse information
  2. The PPI letter
    No response within the timeAssessed on the information INZ already holds
  3. Your response
  4. The decision

What a PPI letter is and when INZ must send one

PPI stands for potentially prejudicial information: factual information or material that will or may adversely affect the outcome of your application. The principle behind the letter is natural justice. INZ's own manual says every officer must give the applicant a fair hearing and avoid bias, and that fairness depends on whether you are informed of information that might harm your case and given a reasonable opportunity to respond.

Where the obligation sits
ApplicationInstructionWhat it covers
ResidenceR5.20.5Prejudicial information you are not necessarily aware of
Temporary visasE7.15Broader still

INZ's guidance to its officers says a PPI letter should identify:

  • Which immigration instruction the officer considers has not been met
  • How it has not been met
  • What the outcome may be

The deadline and how to respond

Common deadline in practice
1 to 2 weeks
Extension generally treated as reasonable
Up to 5 working days

In practice deadlines are commonly around one to two weeks, and extensions of up to five additional working days are generally treated as reasonable when requested with cause. Ask for an extension early and in writing if you need one.

A strong response deals with every concern in the letter, one by one, with evidence, not just assertions.

Answering each concern
If the information INZ holds isYour response
WrongProve the correct position with documents
Right but incompleteSupply the context
Right and damagingAddress it honestly and explain the circumstances rather than ignoring it

Getting your INZ file

You have the right to the personal information INZ holds about you. INZ's requesting-personal-information process uses its request form, and the Privacy Act 2020 sets the time for a response:

“If an agency receives an IPP 6 request and section 43 does not apply, the agency must, as soon as is reasonably practicable, and in any case not later than 20 working days after the day on which the request is received, respond to the request.”

Privacy Act 2020, section 44(1), read on legislation.govt.nz on 28 September 2026

Your file shows what the officer is looking at, and is often the difference between guessing at INZ's concern and answering it:

  • Previous applications
  • Notes
  • Third-party information

For information that is not personal to you, the Official Information Act is the parallel route.

Third-party checks - what INZ verifies behind the scenes

Immigration officers carry a general obligation to take the steps necessary to verify documentation and information, and much of that happens without you seeing it. "Third party check", a phrase that appears on many INZ files, has an official meaning MBIE confirmed under the Official Information Act in 2024:

What a third party check officially refers to
CheckReferred to
National security checksThe New Zealand Security Intelligence Service
Police certificate checksNew Zealand Police

INZ staff also use the term more loosely for verifying documents such as qualifications and work experience.

INZ's public guidance adds that it checks information with other organisations and countries, including its Migration Five border partners, to confirm identity, background and character; in practice verification can also mean contacting employers, partners or referees.

And whatever a check turns up, the fairness instructions close the loop: prejudicial information obtained from a third party must be put to you for comment before INZ relies on it. That is the PPI letter this guide covers, which is why an unexpected letter about your employer, your relationship or a document you supplied is the system working as designed, and your opportunity to answer it.

AI-generated image of a closed laptop and a mug on a wooden desk beside a window, with a garden softly out of focus outside

Interviews, deportation letters and not responding

INZ can also test concerns by interview.

  • You are entitled to an interpreter if you are not fluent in English
  • An immigration lawyer, licensed immigration adviser or family representative may attend with you

One related letter deserves its own mention: residents suspected of having become liable for deportation, for example over information in their residence application, typically receive a letter from INZ's resolutions team inviting comment, often with a Deportation Liability Questionnaire (form INZ 1242). Practitioners sometimes call this a letter of concern, though that is shorthand rather than INZ's term. It is the last step before a deportation liability notice, and the deportation guide covers what follows.

Check your understanding

These questions check what this guide says. They say nothing about your own case.

  1. 1. Is there a single official timeframe for responding to a PPI letter?
  2. 2. Does a pending request for your INZ file normally pause the response deadline?
  3. 3. Under the Privacy Act 2020, how long does an agency have to respond to a request for your personal information?
  4. 4. Is a third-party check that sits on your file for a long time a sign of an adverse finding?
  5. 5. If you do not respond within the specified time, how will a temporary visa application be assessed?

For educational and illustrative purposes only. This is not immigration advice, and no warranty is given as to its appropriateness or accuracy. If in doubt, talk to an immigration adviser or an immigration lawyer about your specific circumstances.

Frequently asked questions

The letter states your deadline: there is no single official timeframe. INZ guidance requires the timeframe to be reasonable for your circumstances, and extensions of up to five additional working days are generally considered reasonable when requested. Ask early and in writing.

The application is decided on the information INZ already holds. For temporary visas the instructions say it will be assessed on the available information; for residence it may be. An unanswered concern effectively becomes a finding against you.

Request your personal information through INZ's request form. The Privacy Act 2020 requires a response no later than 20 working days after the request is received. The file shows what the officer sees: previous applications, notes and third-party information.

No. It is the step before a decision: your legally required opportunity to comment on adverse information. A complete, evidenced response can and regularly does change the outcome.

Officially, per an MBIE response under the Official Information Act, it means national security checks referred to the NZSIS and police certificate checks referred to NZ Police, though INZ staff also use the term for verifying documents such as qualifications and work experience. Check timeframes vary and are not published, and a long-running check is not itself adverse. If a check produces prejudicial information, INZ must put it to you for comment before relying on it.

Sources

More on inz process and fairness

Not sure where to start?

Send one enquiry and we will connect you with a suitable licensed professional.

Get help