The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2025] NZIACDT 51 |
| Parties | NO v Ellis |
| Decided | 2 October 2025 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | James Ellis, licence 201300730, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26c / client engaged adviser to seek student visa / INZ declined application as it was not accepted he would be genuine student and his financial documentation was inadequate / evidence did not support allegation that adviser instructed client to create false narrative to explain gap in tertiary studies / dishonest or misleading behaviour not proven / evidence did not support allegation that adviser failed to properly review and update relevant financial documents before filing / adviser had alerted client of issues with documents on multiple occasions / however, adviser failed to confirm in writing discussions with client relating to incomplete financial evidence / breach of cl26c / adviser unprofessionally communicated with tertiary institute following decline of visa / breach of cl1 / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns James Ellis (licence 201300730, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.