This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2025] NZIACDT 51, NO v Ellis (James Ellis)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 2 October 2025, concerning James Ellis, licence 201300730, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2025] NZIACDT 51
PartiesNO v Ellis
Decided2 October 2025
Licensed immigration adviserJames Ellis, licence 201300730, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26c / client engaged adviser to seek student visa / INZ declined application as it was not accepted he would be genuine student and his financial documentation was inadequate / evidence did not support allegation that adviser instructed client to create false narrative to explain gap in tertiary studies / dishonest or misleading behaviour not proven / evidence did not support allegation that adviser failed to properly review and update relevant financial documents before filing / adviser had alerted client of issues with documents on multiple occasions / however, adviser failed to confirm in writing discussions with client relating to incomplete financial evidence / breach of cl26c / adviser unprofessionally communicated with tertiary institute following decline of visa / breach of cl1 / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2025] NZIACDT 51 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns James Ellis (licence 201300730, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources