The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2025] NZIACDT 52 |
| Parties | SH v McGarrigle |
| Decided | 10 October 2025 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Zamelia McGarrigle, licence 201400076, expired |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl19l, cl26f / complainant engaged adviser to seek visa for adult daughter / adviser incorrectly advised complainant that the client was beyond the dependence age and could only apply for a visitor, student or work visa / no evidence that client was unwilling to fund more expensive residence application / breach of cl1 / adviser failed to disclose entitlement to commission from private business school and obtain informed consent from complainant in writing / no eventual receipt of commission no defence / breaches of cl5 and cl6 / adviser failed to comply with complainant’s request for full client file / inappropriately required client to complete authority to send request for information to INZ / breaches of cl1 and cl26f / alternative negligence heads dismissed / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Zamelia McGarrigle (licence 201400076, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.