This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2025] NZIACDT 52, SH v McGarrigle (Zamelia McGarrigle)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 10 October 2025, concerning Zamelia McGarrigle, licence 201400076, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2025] NZIACDT 52
PartiesSH v McGarrigle
Decided10 October 2025
Licensed immigration adviserZamelia McGarrigle, licence 201400076, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl19l, cl26f / complainant engaged adviser to seek visa for adult daughter / adviser incorrectly advised complainant that the client was beyond the dependence age and could only apply for a visitor, student or work visa / no evidence that client was unwilling to fund more expensive residence application / breach of cl1 / adviser failed to disclose entitlement to commission from private business school and obtain informed consent from complainant in writing / no eventual receipt of commission no defence / breaches of cl5 and cl6 / adviser failed to comply with complainant’s request for full client file / inappropriately required client to complete authority to send request for information to INZ / breaches of cl1 and cl26f / alternative negligence heads dismissed / sanctions to follow”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2025] NZIACDT 52 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Zamelia McGarrigle (licence 201400076, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources