[2023] NZIACDT 7 — EQ v McCarthy (Christopher Mark McCarthy)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 20 March 2023 · adviser: Christopher Mark McCarthy

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Sanctions / adviser submitted EOIs without instructions and failed to communicate with INZ or the client for long periods / lacked diligence and due care / nine unprofessional acts breaching 10 Code provisions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl15b, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e, cl26f, cl27b, cl28c / HELD / second appearance before Tribunal, with prior decision involving dishonest or misleading behaviour / ill-health an important mitigating factor / has not renewed licence / no submissions on sanctions from complainant or adviser despite extensions / adviser censured / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty, having regard to breaches, disciplinary record and health / no submissions as to a fair and reasonable refund for service fee and the Tribunal declines to speculate / $5,070 refund ordered for application fees not incurred / no compensation sought by complainant

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.