This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 7, EQ v McCarthy (Christopher Mark McCarthy)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 20 March 2023, concerning Christopher Mark McCarthy, licence 200901051, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 7
PartiesEQ v McCarthy
Decided20 March 2023
Licensed immigration adviserChristopher Mark McCarthy, licence 200901051, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser submitted EOIs without instructions and failed to communicate with INZ or the client for long periods / lacked diligence and due care / nine unprofessional acts breaching 10 Code provisions / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl15b, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e, cl26f, cl27b, cl28c / HELD / second appearance before Tribunal, with prior decision involving dishonest or misleading behaviour / ill-health an important mitigating factor / has not renewed licence / no submissions on sanctions from complainant or adviser despite extensions / adviser censured / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty, having regard to breaches, disciplinary record and health / no submissions as to a fair and reasonable refund for service fee and the Tribunal declines to speculate / $5,070 refund ordered for application fees not incurred / no compensation sought by complainant”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 7 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Christopher Mark McCarthy (licence 200901051, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Wellington.

Sources