A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2023] NZIACDT 6 |
| Parties | NI v Chak |
| Decided | 1 March 2023 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Chun Wang Clement Chak, licence 200800562, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions / adviser failed to provide invoices on two occasions when fees were payable / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl22 / adviser has been licensed for almost 14 years, first appearance before Tribunal / accepts Tribunal’s decision / wrongdoing towards lower end of the spectrum / adviser cautioned / neither censure nor monetary penalty justified”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Chun Wang Clement Chak (licence 200800562, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.