This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 5, SM v KIM

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 15 February 2023.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 5
PartiesSM v KIM
Decided15 February 2023

The Tribunal's published summary

“Adviser failed to set out a full description of the services to be provided & the fees for those services in a written agreement / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s7, s442, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl19e, cl19f, cl20a, cl22 / Immigration New Zealand (Calder) v Cleland [2019] NZIACDT 25 / HELD / adviser provided immigration advice and employment recruitment services to complainant in parallel without separation / in the absence of separation, the adviser’s professional obligations extend to the recruitment services / breach of cl19e and cl19f for failing to include description of recruitment services and associated fee information in written agreement / invoice provided did not contain a full description of recruitment services, but would not warrant disciplinary action / complainant’s narrative that recruitment services were not provided is rejected as false / complaint fee not fair and reasonable dismissed as no evidence provided of a reasonable fee”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 5 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources