The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2023] NZIACDT 4 |
| Parties | TC v MacLeod |
| Decided | 7 February 2023 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Iain Craig MacLeod, licence 200800220, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Diligence and due care / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl19f, cl20a, cl20b / HELD / adviser failed to exercise diligence and due care by not sufficiently knowing forecasted revenue figure in business plan & incorrectly asserting he had a written confirmation of the wrong figure from INZ or that INZ had not referred to the correct figure previously / not professional or respectful in blaming complainant and INZ for his wrong advice / Tribunal does not accept adviser was dishonest, rather he lacked due care / adviser admitted failure to provide an estimate of time in written agreement when required by cl19f / fees charged not reasonable and time spent getting up to speed resolving the revenue discrepancy cannot be justified / complaint partially upheld”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Iain Craig MacLeod (licence 200800220, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.