This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2023] NZIACDT 3, MT v LL

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 2 February 2023.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2023] NZIACDT 3
PartiesMT v LL
Decided2 February 2023

The Tribunal's published summary

“Registrar filed complaint / dishonest and misleading behaviour / adviser suggested complainant look for another job while waiting for his work visa to be approved / adviser proposed complainant obtain a variation or a new visa to support the new job / adviser failed to inform INZ that complainant no longer possessed a legitimate offer of employment from the employer / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s452, s453, / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl31a / complainant expressly asked adviser not to withdraw visa application / complainant was hoping to solve the problem with training / resolution of employment dispute, through retraining, was a reasonable option for the adviser to have in mind / advice about seeking new job was intended as plan b if no resolution was reached / adviser unaware of complainant’s resort to an exploitation visa / no dishonesty or misleading behaviour / no lack of due diligence or care / complaint dismissed”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2023] NZIACDT 3 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources