This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2021] NZIACDT 13, TI v Malcolm (Timothy James Malcolm)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 8 June 2021, concerning Timothy James Malcolm, licence 200800823, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2021] NZIACDT 13
PartiesTI v Malcolm
Decided8 June 2021
Licensed immigration adviserTimothy James Malcolm, licence 200800823, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Misleading behaviour / advised failed to submit application on time & concealed application had not been submitted / did not pass on INZ letter to complainant / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014, cl 1, cl2a, cl26b, cl26e / lack of due care / application urgent and straightforward / should have been made earlier, including copy of passport & online to speed up processing / failed to advise of and respond to INZ letter / adviser misled complainant as to when application would be filed and lied, blaming delay on INZ / clause in agreement not to contact INZ not found to be scheme to mislead / failure to communicate, provide advice and reply to INZ letter a breach of trust and confidence / failed to update complainant / adviser failed to provide copy of client file to Registrar / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2021] NZIACDT 13 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Timothy James Malcolm (licence 200800823, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources