This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2021] NZIACDT 11, YC v Han (Yujuan Han)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 May 2021, concerning Yujuan Han, licence 201701112, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2021] NZIACDT 11
PartiesYC v Han
Decided19 May 2021
Licensed immigration adviserYujuan Han, licence 201701112, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Provisional adviser / not named in client agreement / no details of provisional adviser in agreement / / failure to confirm application filed and provide timely updates / provisional adviser supervised by adviser / provisional adviser went on leave / no response to PPI letter, so complainant’s visa declined / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl18a, cl19c, cl26b / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s422 / no breach of cl1 / failure to inform INZ provisional adviser on leave did not meet disciplinary threshold / supervisor responsible for non-response to PPI letter / no breach of cl18a / written agreement provided, but did not contain provisional adviser’s name or details / should have advised complainant about PPI letter and extension request / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2021] NZIACDT 11 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Yujuan Han (licence 201701112, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources