This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2021] NZIACDT 10, YC v Wan (Jiale Wan)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 May 2021, concerning Jiale Wan, licence 201200703, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2021] NZIACDT 10
PartiesYC v Wan
Decided19 May 2021
Licensed immigration adviserJiale Wan, licence 201200703, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Diligence / failure to ensure response to INZ letter / adviser supervising provisional adviser / provisional adviser not named in client agreement / complainant advised by provisional adviser, who went on leave pending INZ reply to extension request / complainant’s visa declined / failure to engage with complainant / failure to update complainant / complainant not told of PPI letter / failure to provide full copy of file when requested / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl19a, cl19c, cl26b, cl26f / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s422 / adviser not professional or diligent in following up & failed to respond to PPI letter / should have met with complainant and provided updates / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2021] NZIACDT 10 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Jiale Wan (licence 201200703, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources