[2019] NZIACDT 58 — INZ (Calder) v Tian (Qing Tian)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 27 August 2019 · adviser: Qing Tian

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Sanctions decision / lack of professionalism and due care / failure to provide full files to Authority / adviser misunderstood immigration instructions / wrongly asserted IELTS not justified / unprofessional communications with INZ / adviser made personal attacks against officers with no merit / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c, cl26e / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / persons other than client must also be treated professionally and with respect / conduct not in clients’ best interests / statutory demands to produce files straightforward / correspondence with INZ at high end of unprofessional correspondence / adviser censured and ordered to pay penalty of $2000.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.