The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2019] NZIACDT 59 |
| Parties | INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz |
| Decided | 29 August 2019 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Maria Socorro Angela Ortiz, licence 201200057, refused |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Breach of professional obligations & Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 / exploitation of unlawful employee / dishonesty / client had work visa for farm work but was instead worked for adviser’s husband as a hairdresser / client not paid for work / client not permitted to work / adviser told INZ client was a volunteer / adviser convicted of being a party to exploitation / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl18a, cl26b/ Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s44 / adviser failed to establish professional relationship with client / adviser failed to inform client he could not work / adviser’s conduct grossly unprofessional / insufficient evidence adviser was operating through husband on immigration matters / adviser’s behaviour false and misleading / convictions breach of Code but punitive sanction not considered due to punishment in criminal process / public interest sanction necessary as cannot regain licence / complaint upheld.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Maria Socorro Angela Ortiz (licence 201200057, refused). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Christchurch.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.