[2019] NZIACDT 57 — LT v SH

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 7 August 2019

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 / providing misleading information / visitor visa application declined due to failure to declare previous exclusion from Australia / complainant assisted by an education agent / alleged agent was unlicensed subagent of adviser / in explaining earlier failure to declare, adviser sent letter to INZ which made no mention of unlicensed advice / futile application / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9a, cl9b / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s44 / no lack of due care / no evidence agent was a subagent of adviser / client aware of risk of failure / failure to obtain written acknowledgment of risks not sufficiently serious to meet threshold in this case / complaint dismissed.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.