This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges — if you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

immigrationadviser.co.nz

[2019] NZIACDT 16INZ (Foley) v Niland (Lynn Barbara Niland)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 19 March 2019 · adviser: Lynn Barbara Niland

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / allowing unlicensed people to manage visa application process / adviser entered arrangements with companies that sourced jobs for Sri Lankan & Filipino workers / failure to personally engage with each client / adviser had little or no contact with clients / lack of clarity as to respective responsibilities of company & adviser / adviser facilitated provision of immigration advice by unlicensed staff / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser negligent but breach not deliberate / adviser careless as to contractual arrangements & misunderstood limits of clerical work exclusion / adviser overlooked template agreement not suited to her or clients’ needs / adviser censured, ordered to undertake refresher course & pay penalty of $4,000.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Lynn Barbara Niland (licence 200902257, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.