This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 15, GZ v Lu (Ke Lu)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 15 March 2019, concerning Ke Lu, licence 201400171, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 15
PartiesGZ v Lu
Decided15 March 2019
Licensed immigration adviserKe Lu, licence 201400171, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / adviser director of company providing student placement services / complainant & son applied for visitor visa before student visa / unlicensed staff prepared application / application declined because it did not disclose son’s placement offer & INZ concerned it was not genuine / adviser not involved with application but finalised letter in response to INZ concerns / adviser not involved in management of company & believed it only provided placement services / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / any competent adviser would have realised unlicensed staff providing advice on receiving draft response letter / business structure not designed to circumvent legislation & no pattern of misconduct / violation at lower end of rubber stamping spectrum but still serious / adviser facilitated conduct of unlicensed staff in finalising letter to INZ / adviser not professional or diligent & did not exercise due care / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 15 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Ke Lu (licence 201400171, expired). See the full licence history on their profile.

Sources