This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 17, Singh v Patel (Jignesh Kumar Patel)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 28 March 2019, concerning Jignesh Kumar Patel, licence 200901980, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 17
PartiesSingh v Patel
Decided28 March 2019
Licensed immigration adviserJignesh Kumar Patel, licence 200901980, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Excessive fees / failure to record meetings and discussions / residence application / adviser charged $15,000 standard fee / adviser prepared application which required analysis of financial information / complainant signed application & paid second instalment of fees / complainant changed his mind & requested withdrawal of application & full refund of fees / complainant terminated agreement / adviser offered a partial refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl20, cl24, cl26 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser should have recorded material discussions in writing / fee at higher end of scale but not unfair or unreasonable / urgency relevant factor in setting fee / adviser carried out substantial work at time agreement was terminated / work largely completed & only some documents outstanding / refund fair / adviser under no obligation to refund more than small part of fee / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 17 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Jignesh Kumar Patel (licence 200901980, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Wellington.

Sources