This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges — if you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

immigrationadviser.co.nz

Tuigamala Laufou Taavao Vole (Tui)

ExpiredFull licence

Tuigamala Laufou Taavao Vole held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 200800622, first issued in 2008. The licence is now expired.

Tuigamala Laufou Taavao Vole is not a currently licensed immigration adviser. Their licence has expired and they are not currently permitted to give New Zealand immigration advice unless they hold an exemption. Check the official IAA register before engaging anyone for immigration advice.

Licence details

Licence number
200800622
Licence status
Expired
Licence type
Full
First licensed
2008
Licence last issued
20 January 2021
Location
Auckland, New Zealand

Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.

Register context

Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.

Licence history

Every filing recorded on the register for licence 200800622, newest first.

  1. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2021
  2. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2020
  3. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2019
  4. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2018
  5. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2017
  6. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2016
  7. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2015
  8. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2014
  9. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2013
  10. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2012
  11. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2011
  12. Full licence - Renewal · 20 January 2010
  13. Full licence - Initial application · 20 January 2009

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions

Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Tuigamala Laufou Taavao Vole. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — read each outcome; some complaints are dismissed.

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

31 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Tuigamala Laufou Taavao Vole as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

Appeal typeCasesAllowedDismissedOtherSuccess rateAll appellants
Residence: special policies1037030%(3 of 10)72%
Deportation: non-resident725029%(2 of 7)37%
Residence: partnership752071%(5 of 7)52%
Residence: parent31201 of 342%
Residence: sibling & adult child21101 of 249%
Residence: dependent child10100 of 166%
Residence: skilled migrant10100 of 148%
Outcomes by appeal typeAllowedOtherDismissed
Residence: special policiesResidence: special policies — Allowed: 3 of 10Residence: special policies — Dismissed or declined: 7 of 1010Deportation: non-residentDeportation: non-resident — Allowed: 2 of 7Deportation: non-resident — Dismissed or declined: 5 of 77Residence: partnershipResidence: partnership — Allowed: 5 of 7Residence: partnership — Dismissed or declined: 2 of 77Residence: parentResidence: parent — Allowed: 1 of 3Residence: parent — Dismissed or declined: 2 of 33Residence: sibling & adult ch…Residence: sibling & adult child — Allowed: 1 of 2Residence: sibling & adult child — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 22Residence: dependent childResidence: dependent child — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 11Residence: skilled migrantResidence: skilled migrant — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 11

Showing the 15 most recent of 31 decisions; the totals above cover all of them.

This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.

Is this you? Claim this listing

Worth a readHow to complain about an immigration adviser in New ZealandWhere complaints about licensed immigration advisers go, what the IAA and the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal can do, time limits, costs, and the separate paths for lawyers and unlicensed operators.Free toolIACDT decisions archiveEvery published decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, summarised and linked to adviser profiles.

Before you engage any adviser

  • Confirm the licence is Current on the official IAA register.
  • Ask for a written agreement setting out services and fees before paying anything.
  • Licensed advisers must follow the IAA code of conduct; complaints go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.

Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.