Shehzad Ali Raja (Shehzad)

Shehzad Ali Raja is a licensed immigration adviser, holding licence 200901559 since first licensing in 2009.

Licence number

200901559

Licence status

Current

Licence type

Full

First licensed

2009

Years licensed

17

Licence last issued

12 May 2026

Licence expires

11 May 2027

Role

Director

Published IPT appealsi

22

Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.

Register context

Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.

• First licensed in 2009, alongside 103 others from that year still licensed today. About 91% of the 1,690 advisers holding a current licence were first licensed more recently.
• Holds one of 1,376 full licences on the current register.
• One of 5 currently licensed advisers based in United Arab Emirates.
• The register records 18 filings for this licence between 12 May 2009 and 26 March 2026.

Licence history

Every filing recorded on the register for licence 200901559, newest first.

1. Full licence issued - Renewal · 26 March 2026
2. Full licence issued - Renewal · 15 March 2025
3. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2024
4. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2023
5. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2022
6. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2021
7. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2020
8. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2019
9. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2018
10. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2017
11. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2016
12. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2015
13. Full licence - TTMRA application · 12 May 2014
14. Full licence - TTMRA application · 12 May 2013
15. Full licence - TTMRA application · 12 May 2012
16. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2011
17. Full licence - Renewal · 12 May 2010
18. Full licence - TTMRA application · 12 May 2009

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

22 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Shehzad Ali Raja as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

• [2024] NZIPT 206707eResidence: other · 30 January 2024Allowed
• [2021] NZIPT 206257eResidence: skilled migrant · 19 November 2021Allowed
• [2021] NZIPT 505271Deportation: non-resident · 11 August 2021Dismissed/declined
• [2021] NZIPT 505125Deportation: non-resident · 4 March 2021Dismissed/declined
• [2019] NZIPT 205568eResidence: special policies · 6 November 2019Allowed
• [2019] NZIPT 205395eResidence: skilled migrant · 28 May 2019Allowed
• [2019] NZIPT 504399Deportation: non-resident · 31 January 2019Dismissed/declined
• [2018] NZIPT 204943eResidence: skilled migrant · 9 November 2018Allowed
• [2018] NZIPT 204659eResidence: skilled migrant · 31 May 2018Allowed
• [2018] NZIPT 503679Deportation: non-resident · 25 January 2018Dismissed/declined
• [2018] NZIPT 503747Deportation: non-resident · 25 January 2018Dismissed/declined
• [2017] NZIPT 503605Deportation: non-resident · 3 November 2017Dismissed/declined
• [2017] NZIPT 203970dResidence: skilled migrant · 20 July 2017Allowed — returned to INZ
• [2017] NZIPT 502931Deportation: non-resident · 7 April 2017Dismissed/declined
• [2017] NZIPT 203720dResidence: partnership · 7 April 2017Allowed — returned to INZ

Showing the 15 most recent of 22 decisions; the totals above cover all of them.

This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.