Richard Uday Prakash

Richard Uday Prakash held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 200900028, first issued in 2009. The licence is now refused.

Licence number

200900028

Licence status

Refused

Licence type

Full

First licensed

2009

Role

Director

Location

Auckland, New Zealand

Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.

Register context

Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.

• One of 802 currently licensed advisers based in Auckland.
• The register records 4 filings for this licence between 1 April 2009 and 1 April 2012.

Licence history

Every filing recorded on the register for licence 200900028, newest first.

1. Full licence - Renewal · 1 April 2012
2. Full licence - Renewal · 1 April 2011
3. Full licence - Renewal · 1 April 2010
4. Full licence - Initial application · 1 April 2009

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions

Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Richard Uday Prakash. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — read each outcome; some complaints are dismissed.

• [2014] NZIACDT 107 — Kanta v Prakash2 October 2014
• [2014] NZIACDT 106 — Somlu v Prakash2 October 2014
• [2014] NZIACDT 68 — Somlu v Prakash17 June 2014
• [2014] NZIACDT 64 — Kanta v Prakash5 May 2014
• [2012] NZIACDT 85 — Chand and Kumari v Prakash3 December 2012
• [2012] NZIACDT 60 — Chand and Kumari v Prakash28 September 2012

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

7 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Richard Uday Prakash as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

• [2014] NZIPT 600001Deportation: resident · 30 April 2014Dismissed/declined
• [2012] NZIPT 200548aResidence: sibling & adult child · 25 September 2012Dismissed/declined
• [2012] NZIPT 201242Residence: skilled migrant · 21 September 2012No jurisdiction
• [2012] NZIPT 200728dResidence: skilled migrant · 12 September 2012Allowed — returned to INZ
• [2012] NZIPT 200533aResidence: sibling & adult child · 6 June 2012Dismissed/declined
• [2012] NZIPT 200401aResidence: skilled migrant · 21 February 2012Dismissed/declined
• [2009] NZIPT 16266eResidence: skilled migrant · 16 October 2009Allowed

This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.

Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.