A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2012] NZIACDT 85 |
| Parties | Chand and Kumari v Prakash |
| Decided | 3 December 2012 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Richard Uday Prakash, licence 200900028, refused |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Penalty decision.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Richard Uday Prakash (licence 200900028, refused). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.