Eduardo Maala Sampang
ExpiredFull licenceEduardo Maala Sampang held New Zealand immigration adviser licence 201000587, first issued in 2010. The licence is now expired.
Licence details
- Licence number
- 201000587
- Licence status
- Expired
- Licence type
- Full
- First licensed
- 2010
- Licence last issued
- 22 December 2013
- Location
- Auckland, New Zealand
Source: IAA public register, refreshed September 2026. Verify on the official register.
Register context
Where this licence sits in the register as at September 2026 — all figures derived from the IAA public register, none editorial.
- One of 802 currently licensed advisers based in Auckland.
- The register records 4 filings for this licence between 22 December 2010 and 22 December 2013.
Licence history
Every filing recorded on the register for licence 201000587, newest first.
- Full licence - Renewal · 22 December 2013
- Full licence - Renewal · 22 December 2012
- Full licence - Renewal · 22 December 2011
- Full licence - Initial application · 22 December 2010
Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal decisions
Published decisions of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal concerning Eduardo Maala Sampang. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — read each outcome; some complaints are dismissed.
- [2015] NZIACDT 110 — Senadipathi & Xavier v Sampang23 December 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 43 — Senadipathi & Xavier v Sampang20 April 2015
- [2015] NZIACDT 12 — Cabagnot v Sampang27 February 2015
Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record
20 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Eduardo Maala Sampang as representative for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.
| Appeal type | Cases | Allowed | Dismissed | Other | Success rate | All appellants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residence: skilled migrant | 16 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 21%(3 of 14) | 48% |
| Deportation: non-resident | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 of 3 | 37% |
| Residence: partnership | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 of 1 | 52% |
- [2015] NZIPT 202158aResidence: skilled migrant · 4 February 2015Dismissed/declined
- [2014] NZIPT 202024aResidence: skilled migrant · 24 September 2014Dismissed/declined
- [2014] NZIPT 202264Residence: skilled migrant · 14 August 2014No jurisdiction
- [2014] NZIPT 202005aResidence: partnership · 28 July 2014Dismissed/declined
- [2014] NZIPT 201574aResidence: skilled migrant · 31 March 2014Dismissed/declined
- [2014] NZIPT 202027Residence: skilled migrant · 27 February 2014No jurisdiction
- [2014] NZIPT 201541aResidence: skilled migrant · 20 February 2014Dismissed/declined
- [2013] NZIPT 201752aResidence: skilled migrant · 30 September 2013Dismissed/declined
- [2013] NZIPT 201684aResidence: skilled migrant · 28 August 2013Dismissed/declined
- [2013] NZIPT 201023aResidence: skilled migrant · 28 May 2013Dismissed/declined
- [2013] NZIPT 201028aResidence: skilled migrant · 28 May 2013Dismissed/declined
- [2013] NZIPT 500726Deportation: non-resident · 29 April 2013Dismissed/declined
- [2013] NZIPT 500767Deportation: non-resident · 29 April 2013Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 500568Deportation: non-resident · 27 November 2012Dismissed/declined
- [2012] NZIPT 200767aResidence: skilled migrant · 16 October 2012Dismissed/declined
Showing the 15 most recent of 20 decisions; the totals above cover all of them.
This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the representativeby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.
Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the representative named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.
Before you engage any adviser
- Confirm the licence is Current on the official IAA register.
- Ask for a written agreement setting out services and fees before paying anything.
- Licensed advisers must follow the IAA code of conduct; complaints go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.
Compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.