immigrationadviser.co.nz

Tonderai Mukusha

LawyerT3
192 published IPT appealsMultiple practice areas

Tonderai Mukusha practises immigration law at Senthil & Mukusha in Auckland (Director), and was admitted as a barrister and solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand in 2009.

Lawyers are not licensed immigration advisers, and do not need to be. Lawyers with a current New Zealand practising certificate are exempt from adviser licensing under the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and are regulated by the New Zealand Law Society. Verify Tonderai Mukusha on the NZLS register entry.

Details

Role
Director
Firm
Senthil & Mukusha
Admitted
8 May 2009
Years since admission
17
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Regulator
New Zealand Law Society
Practice breadth
Immigration among multiple practice areas
Published IPT appeals
192

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

192 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Tonderai Mukusha as counsel for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

Appeal typeCasesAllowedDismissedOtherSuccess rateAll appellants
Refugee & protection1153282128%21%
Deportation: non-resident502129042%37%
Deportation: resident1101100%33%
Residence: partnership532060%52%
Residence: parent312033%42%
Residence: dependent child321067%66%
Residence: skilled migrant312033%48%
Residence: sibling & adult child10100%49%
Residence: special policies1001—72%
Outcomes by appeal typeAllowedOtherDismissed
Refugee & protectionRefugee & protection — Allowed: 32 of 115Refugee & protection — Other (referred, withdrawn, jurisdiction): 1 of 115Refugee & protection — Dismissed or declined: 82 of 115115Deportation: non-residentDeportation: non-resident — Allowed: 21 of 50Deportation: non-resident — Dismissed or declined: 29 of 5050Deportation: residentDeportation: resident — Dismissed or declined: 11 of 1111Residence: partnershipResidence: partnership — Allowed: 3 of 5Residence: partnership — Dismissed or declined: 2 of 55Residence: parentResidence: parent — Allowed: 1 of 3Residence: parent — Dismissed or declined: 2 of 33Residence: dependent childResidence: dependent child — Allowed: 2 of 3Residence: dependent child — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 33Residence: skilled migrantResidence: skilled migrant — Allowed: 1 of 3Residence: skilled migrant — Dismissed or declined: 2 of 33Residence: sibling & adult ch…Residence: sibling & adult child — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 11Residence: special policiesResidence: special policies — Other (referred, withdrawn, jurisdiction): 1 of 11

Showing the 15 most recent of 192 decisions; the totals above cover all of them.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the counselnamed in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.

Get help with your immigration matter

Tell us what you need in a couple of sentences. Enquiries are received and triaged by immigrationadviser.co.nz — we connect you with a licensed professional suited to your case.

Worth a readHow to become a licensed immigration adviser in New ZealandThe pathway to an IAA licence: the Graduate Diploma in New Zealand Immigration Advice, the provisional licence and two years of supervision, fees, the fit and proper person test, and the exemptions.Free toolINZ forms libraryEvery current INZ form, with version tracking and use-by dates for superseded versions.

Compare immigration lawyers in Auckland or licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.