Kamil Lakshman

Lawyer

7 published IPT appealsImmigration-only practice

Kamil Lakshman practises immigration law at Idesi Legal in Auckland (Principal lawyer), and was admitted as a barrister and solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand in 2000.

Lawyers are not licensed immigration advisers, and do not need to be. Lawyers with a current New Zealand practising certificate are exempt from adviser licensing under the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and are regulated by the New Zealand Law Society. Verify Kamil Lakshman on the NZLS register entry.

Details

Role: Principal lawyer
Firm: Idesi Legal
Admitted: 15 September 2000
Years since admission: 26
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Regulator: New Zealand Law Society
Practice breadth: Immigration law only
Published IPT appeals: 7

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

7 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Kamil Lakshman as counsel for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

Appeal type	Cases	Allowed	Dismissed	Other	Success rate	All appellants
Deportation: non-resident	5	2	3	0	40%(2 of 5)	37%
Refugee & protection	2	0	2	0	0 of 2	21%

Outcomes by appeal typeAllowedOtherDismissed

[2024] NZIPT 506274Deportation: non-resident · 23 July 2024Allowed
[2024] NZIPT 802200Refugee & protection · 19 January 2024Dismissed/declined
[2020] NZIPT 504474Deportation: non-resident · 20 March 2020Dismissed/declined
[2019] NZIPT 801564Refugee & protection · 31 October 2019Dismissed/declined
[2019] NZIPT 504662Deportation: non-resident · 17 September 2019Dismissed/declined
[2015] NZIPT 502203Deportation: non-resident · 17 November 2015Dismissed/declined
[2013] NZIPT 500873Deportation: non-resident · 11 October 2013Allowed

This record may be incomplete. Tribunal decisions usually name the counselby initial and surname only — “J Bloggs” rather than a full name. Where that could point to more than one person on the register, we leave the decision out rather than risk crediting it to the wrong practitioner, so a practitioner may have appeared in more decisions than are shown here. If appearances of yours are missing, tell us on the corrections page and we will verify them against the published decisions and update the profile.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the counsel named in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. Percentages are shown only where at least 5appeals in that category were decided — below that the counts are given on their own, because a single case would swing the figure. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.

Is this you? Claim this listing

Worth a readThe Immigration Act 2009 explained — a map of New Zealand immigration lawWhat the Immigration Act 2009 covers and how it is organised: its 13 parts, the sections people actually meet (11, 15-17, 61, 154, 185-187, 351A), what changed in November 2025, the difference between the Act and immigration instructions, and the amendment bill before Parliament.Free toolLicence checkerVerify any immigration adviser ever registered, including lapsed licences.

Compare immigration lawyers in Auckland or licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.