immigrationadviser.co.nz

Carole Curtis

LawyerT3
384 published IPT appealsMultiple practice areasImmigration is 1 of 5 declared practice areas

Carole Curtis practises immigration law at Marshall Bird & Curtis in Auckland (Sole practitioner), and was admitted as a barrister and solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand in 1989.

Lawyers are not licensed immigration advisers, and do not need to be. Lawyers with a current New Zealand practising certificate are exempt from adviser licensing under the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and are regulated by the New Zealand Law Society. Verify Carole Curtis on the NZLS register entry.

Details

Role
Sole practitioner
Firm
Marshall Bird & Curtis
Admitted
16 June 1989
Years since admission
37
Location
Auckland, New Zealand
Regulator
New Zealand Law Society
Practice breadth
Immigration among 5 practice areas
Published IPT appeals
384

Immigration and Protection Tribunal appeal record

384 published decisions of the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (and its predecessor boards) record Carole Curtis as counsel for the appellant. Success rates say as much about which cases a professional takes on as about their work — compare them with the all-appellant rate for the same appeal type, and read the decisions themselves.

Appeal typeCasesAllowedDismissedOtherSuccess rateAll appellants
Refugee & protection2451051281245%21%
Deportation: non-resident783542145%37%
Deportation: resident461926142%33%
Residence: skilled migrant733150%48%
Residence: special policies541080%72%
Residence: partnership321067%52%
Outcomes by appeal typeAllowedOtherDismissed
Refugee & protectionRefugee & protection — Allowed: 105 of 245Refugee & protection — Other (referred, withdrawn, jurisdiction): 12 of 245Refugee & protection — Dismissed or declined: 128 of 245245Deportation: non-residentDeportation: non-resident — Allowed: 35 of 78Deportation: non-resident — Other (referred, withdrawn, jurisdiction): 1 of 78Deportation: non-resident — Dismissed or declined: 42 of 7878Deportation: residentDeportation: resident — Allowed: 19 of 46Deportation: resident — Other (referred, withdrawn, jurisdiction): 1 of 46Deportation: resident — Dismissed or declined: 26 of 4646Residence: skilled migrantResidence: skilled migrant — Allowed: 3 of 7Residence: skilled migrant — Other (referred, withdrawn, jurisdiction): 1 of 7Residence: skilled migrant — Dismissed or declined: 3 of 77Residence: special policiesResidence: special policies — Allowed: 4 of 5Residence: special policies — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 55Residence: partnershipResidence: partnership — Allowed: 2 of 3Residence: partnership — Dismissed or declined: 1 of 33

Showing the 15 most recent of 384 decisions; the totals above cover all of them.

Compiled from decisions published on the Ministry of Justice tribunal decisions database. A decision is attributed only when the counselnamed in it matches exactly one person on the relevant register (or the firm named in the decision confirms the match); self-represented appellants and uncertain matches are excluded, so this may undercount. “Other” includes referrals to the Minister, withdrawn appeals and jurisdiction decisions. Context for the all-appellant rates: appeal success rates in New Zealand.

Get help with your immigration matter

Tell us what you need in a couple of sentences. Enquiries are received and triaged by immigrationadviser.co.nz — we connect you with a licensed professional suited to your case.

Compare immigration lawyers in Auckland or licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.