The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2026] NZIACDT 48 |
| Parties | INZ v Singh |
| Decided | 17 August 2026 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Paramjit Singh, licence 201002149, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3a, cl4a, cl14, cl22, cl23, cl26aiii, cl26aiv, cl26c, cl26d, cl26e, cl 31a / adviser acted for two clients / breach of cl1 / failed to provide clients with draft applications before filing / failed to apply for a visa for second client in a timely manner / breach of cl1, cl3a / permitted unlicensed person to undertake immigration advice work / breach of cl4a / failed to preserve client confidentiality / documents concerning another client sent to first client / breach of cl14 / failed to provide second client evidence of being licensed / breach of cl22, cl23, cl26iv / failed to provide second client with an invoice and receipt for cash payment / breach of cl26aiii, cl26e / failed to retain all written communications / failed to retain them on file and provide them to the Authority / breach of cl26c / failure to confirm material discussions in writing to clients / failed to ensure other adviser complied with this requirement / breach of cl26 / failed to train staff and other adviser to maintain well-managed client files / breach of cl1, cl31a / negligent provision of incorrect information to Immigration NZ / sanctions to follow”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Paramjit Singh (licence 201002149, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.