This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges — if you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

immigrationadviser.co.nz

[2026] NZIACDT 45BM v Nantes (Josenia Bautista Nantes)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 7 August 2026 · adviser: Josenia Bautista Nantes

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Sanctions / adviser found liable for five breaches of professional standards / most serious breach erroneous approach to seeking overseas police certificate that probably led to decline of residence / high degree of carelessness / adviser services of no value to client / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17b, cl18b, cl26b, cl26c / second complaint upheld by the Tribunal (10 breaches of the Code) / no acknowledgement of harm or apology / censured / directed to complete further training / ordered to pay $3,000 financial penalty / ordered to refund $4,480 for professional and Immigration NZ fees / compensation of $5,000 for emotional damages

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Josenia Bautista Nantes (licence 201601189, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all immigration advisers in Auckland.

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.