This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2025] NZIACDT 21, KA v Wen (Xinru Wen)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 5 March 2025, concerning Xinru Wen, licence 202100205, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2025] NZIACDT 21
PartiesKA v Wen
Decided5 March 2025
Licensed immigration adviserXinru Wen, licence 202100205, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18a, cl18b, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26d / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / breaches of cl1, cl2e / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide professional standards and complaints procedure / breaches of cl17a, cl17b, cl17c / failed to provide copy of visa application prior to lodgement / breach of cl1 / failed to provide service agreement, major departure from expected standard: Tian v TA [2024] NZDC 2759 / breach of cl18a / failure to maintain and provide complete file / breach of cl26aiii / filing system not well-managed / breach of cl26d / failed to advise of lodgement of application / breach of cl26b / no evidence of dishonesty / alternative charges of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2025] NZIACDT 21 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Xinru Wen (licence 202100205, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources