This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2024] NZIACDT 9, ZR v Kim (David Kim)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 4 March 2024, concerning David Kim, licence 200901996, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2024] NZIACDT 9
PartiesZR v Kim
Decided4 March 2024
Licensed immigration adviserDavid Kim, licence 200901996, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / adviser failed to personally obtain instructions from client / failed to provide verbal explanation of professional responsibilities and significant matters in client agreement / Code of Conduct 2014, cl2e, cl17b, cl18b / HELD / second appearance before Tribunal / personal engagement with client is critical to ensure client is properly advised, understands the advice, and that instructions from client are informed / gravity of offending at lower level of medium / adviser accepts Tribunal’s decision and has learned a lesson for future work / multiple breaches of the Code in two complaints show lack of understanding of client engagement, particularly early in the relationship / adviser would benefit from further training / adviser censured / directed to undertake training / ordered to pay $1,500 financial penalty”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2024] NZIACDT 9 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns David Kim (licence 200901996, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources