[2024] NZIACDT 8 — MT v Murthy (Nirmala K Murthy)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 21 February 2024 · adviser: Nirmala K Murthy

The Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's published summary

Sanctions / adviser’s service contract omitted details of second adviser and payment terms / refund clause did not comply with Code / mismanaged client funds / failed to provide file notes in client file / failed to confirm material discussions / failed to manage filing system / failed to ensure visa application documents were correct and complete / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl19a, cl19i, cl24a, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26aiii, cl26c, cl26d / HELD / fifth appearance before Tribunal / gravity of wrongdoing at higher end of moderate given high number of breaches / mismanagement of client funds most serious breaches, but no deceit / no training as adviser recently completed training and wrongdoing occurred before training undertaken / Tribunal cannot ignore systemic wrongdoing / partial refund due to breadth of failures / no compensation as adviser’s conduct did not cause declined visa / adviser censured / ordered to pay $6,000 financial penalty / ordered to refund fees of $1,438

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.