A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2022] NZIACDT 30 |
| Parties | ZK v Li |
| Decided | 19 December 2022 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Hao Li, licence 201600184, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions / adviser failed to confirm oral advice in writing regarding risks of application / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl26c / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / adviser accepted breach of cl26c / evidence shows adviser raised risks orally / adviser cautioned, censure not warranted / compensation & refund for declined application not caused by absence of written confirmation of risk, declined”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Hao Li (licence 201600184, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.