The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2022] NZIACDT 29 |
| Parties | EQ v McCarthy |
| Decided | 19 December 2022 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Christopher Mark McCarthy, licence 200901051, expired |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Diligence and due care / adviser failed to maintain client’s confidence and trust / ceased engaging, did not carry out instructions & did not appropriately withdraw from providing services / filed incomplete EOIs without instructions or written agreement & did not provide updates / did not provide client file to new adviser or IAA / failed to follow internal complaints procedure & provide fair and reasonable refund / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl15b, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e, cl26f, cl27b, cl28c / HELD / psychologist’s report on adviser does not evidence complete inability to act, could have advised client to seek alternative assistance / ill-health not a defence in this case but will mitigate sanctions / required to obtain instructions and express written approval for each immigration application / should have refunded fair and reasonable amount when ceasing services / complaint upheld”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Christopher Mark McCarthy (licence 200901051, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Wellington.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.