This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2022] NZIACDT 13, BU v McCarthy (Christopher Mark McCarthy)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 20 June 2022, concerning Christopher Mark McCarthy, licence 200901051, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2022] NZIACDT 13
PartiesBU v McCarthy
Decided20 June 2022
Licensed immigration adviserChristopher Mark McCarthy, licence 200901051, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions / dishonest behaviour / failed to lodge a s 61 request after accepting instructions and payment to do so / deliberately deceived client into believing request had been made for about 18 months / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / adviser provided no explanation & did not engage with Tribunal / conduct exacerbated by contempt for disciplinary process / serious misconduct with serious consequences for client / adviser censured / no longer licensed / prohibited from applying for a licence for the maximum period (two years) in light of attitude to disciplinary process & no confidence adviser has learned anything / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty / claim for refund of fee ($4,025) not opposed, upheld / award of $2,000 compensation for emotional distress”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2022] NZIACDT 13 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Christopher Mark McCarthy (licence 200901051, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Wellington.

Sources