A fair report of public proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing: some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the Tribunal.
The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2022] NZIACDT 12 |
| Parties | LS v Murthy |
| Decided | 27 May 2022 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Nirmala K Murthy, licence 200901453, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Sanctions / adviser failed to communicate adequately / did not confirm in writing when she lodged application / did not confirm termination of services in writing / Immigration Advisers Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl26b, cl28a / first appearance before Tribunal / important to communicate professionally, but conduct not serious / adviser cautioned / circumstances do not justify a small financial penalty / conduct did not cause complainant loss, no grounds for refund”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Nirmala K Murthy (licence 200901453, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Complaints about a licensed immigration adviser
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.