This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2021] NZIACDT 20, HT v Shaikh (Sarfraz Shaikh)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 27 August 2021, concerning Sarfraz Shaikh, licence 200900488, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2021] NZIACDT 20
PartiesHT v Shaikh
Decided27 August 2021
Licensed immigration adviserSarfraz Shaikh, licence 200900488, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Unprofessional / failure to be professional, diligent and exercise due care / adviser reviewed documents on the evening before visa application deadline & noticed issue / failed to check whether client returned document that evening / failure to refund INZ application fee / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 / adviser knew client’s situation urgent / left document review too late / did not check for client’s response with client or employee / immaterial adviser very busy / threshold for adverse disciplinary finding met / breach of cl1 / multiple failures / adviser responded professionally to errors / failure to refund application fee does not meet disciplinary threshold / client did not ask for refund before complaint / refund made / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2021] NZIACDT 20 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Sarfraz Shaikh (licence 200900488, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources