The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2021] NZIACDT 18 |
| Parties | CL v Khetarpal |
| Decided | 10 August 2021 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Apurva Khetarpal, licence 200900382, refused |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Dishonest and misleading behaviour / adviser provided dishonest and misleading information to the complainant & INZ / numerous breaches of professional obligations / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8c, cl18a, cl22, cl26a, cl26b, cl26e, cl26f, cl28a, cl28b / adviser refused to engage with disciplinary process / uncontested evidence / did not respond to INZ or provide documents / dishonestly reported to complainant & concealed decline decision / prepared statutory declaration & mistranslated the contents / applied for s61 visa without instructions & Ministerial intervention after retainer terminated, both supported by false declaration / failed to provide written agreement and invoice / failed to confirm termination in writing / did not explain adviser held a provisional licence / failed to provide client file to new solicitor / failed to send file to IAA & maintain complete file / complaint upheld”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Apurva Khetarpal (licence 200900382, refused). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.