This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2021] NZIACDT 18, CL v Khetarpal (Apurva Khetarpal)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 10 August 2021, concerning Apurva Khetarpal, licence 200900382, refused.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2021] NZIACDT 18
PartiesCL v Khetarpal
Decided10 August 2021
Licensed immigration adviserApurva Khetarpal, licence 200900382, refused

The Tribunal's published summary

“Dishonest and misleading behaviour / adviser provided dishonest and misleading information to the complainant & INZ / numerous breaches of professional obligations / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8c, cl18a, cl22, cl26a, cl26b, cl26e, cl26f, cl28a, cl28b / adviser refused to engage with disciplinary process / uncontested evidence / did not respond to INZ or provide documents / dishonestly reported to complainant & concealed decline decision / prepared statutory declaration & mistranslated the contents / applied for s61 visa without instructions & Ministerial intervention after retainer terminated, both supported by false declaration / failed to provide written agreement and invoice / failed to confirm termination in writing / did not explain adviser held a provisional licence / failed to provide client file to new solicitor / failed to send file to IAA & maintain complete file / complaint upheld”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2021] NZIACDT 18 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Apurva Khetarpal (licence 200900382, refused). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources