The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2020] NZIACDT 49 |
| Parties | HQT v Singh |
| Decided | 19 November 2020 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Inderpal Singh, licence 201301110, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Rubber stamping / failure to personally engage with client & allowing unlicensed persons to perform immigration services / whether adviser personally undertook & controlled communication with complainant / complainant never met with adviser & only communicated with his staff / adviser involved behind the scene / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c / no evidence of carelessness or lack of due care / adviser did not delegate to staff work that could be regarded as immigration advice / adviser failed to personally engage with complainant / adviser absented himself completely from client relationship concerning substantive immigration work / complaint partially upheld.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Inderpal Singh (licence 201301110, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.