This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 49, HQT v Singh (Inderpal Singh)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 November 2020, concerning Inderpal Singh, licence 201301110, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 49
PartiesHQT v Singh
Decided19 November 2020
Licensed immigration adviserInderpal Singh, licence 201301110, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / failure to personally engage with client & allowing unlicensed persons to perform immigration services / whether adviser personally undertook & controlled communication with complainant / complainant never met with adviser & only communicated with his staff / adviser involved behind the scene / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c / no evidence of carelessness or lack of due care / adviser did not delegate to staff work that could be regarded as immigration advice / adviser failed to personally engage with complainant / adviser absented himself completely from client relationship concerning substantive immigration work / complaint partially upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 49 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Inderpal Singh (licence 201301110, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources