[2020] NZIACDT 48 — ED v Registrar

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 19 November 2020

The tribunal's published summary

Rubber stamping / appeal against Registrar’s decision declining complaint / whether contemporary evidence showing direct communication between adviser & appellant before complaint made / appellant lodged complaint she had never received immigration advice from adviser & agreement did not mention adviser’s company received commission from an English language school / Registrar dismissed complaint on basis it disclosed trivial or inconsequential matter / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451, s54 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl2e, cl 26c / no contemporary evidence of any communication between adviser & appellant before complaint raised / inadequate investigation as to use of unlicensed staff & undisclosed commission / appeal allowed.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.