This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 48, ED v Registrar

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 November 2020.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 48
PartiesED v Registrar
Decided19 November 2020

The Tribunal's published summary

“Rubber stamping / appeal against Registrar’s decision declining complaint / whether contemporary evidence showing direct communication between adviser & appellant before complaint made / appellant lodged complaint she had never received immigration advice from adviser & agreement did not mention adviser’s company received commission from an English language school / Registrar dismissed complaint on basis it disclosed trivial or inconsequential matter / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442, s451, s54 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl2e, cl 26c / no contemporary evidence of any communication between adviser & appellant before complaint raised / inadequate investigation as to use of unlicensed staff & undisclosed commission / appeal allowed.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 48 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

Sources