This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 43, KX v Ji (Yan Ji)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 5 October 2020, concerning Yan Ji, licence 201100562, cancelled.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 43
PartiesKX v Ji
Decided5 October 2020
Licensed immigration adviserYan Ji, licence 201100562, cancelled

The Tribunal's published summary

“Dishonest or misleading behaviour / work visa / adviser failed to inform complainant visa was declined / adviser filed two requests for discretionary visas / adviser failed to inform complainant requests were made & declined / when complainant asked for an update adviser either did not respond or told her INZ had not made a decision / whether adviser has been dishonest / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl26b / adviser’s communications with complainant dishonest & explanations fictitious / no evidence adviser had contacted INZ / adviser concealed decline & filing of discretionary requests / complainant not informed of what happened until 17 months after application declined / adviser failed to take instructions or update complainant / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 43 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Yan Ji (licence 201100562, cancelled). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources