This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 42, NMS v Mercado (Rowel Mercado Mercado)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 1 October 2020, concerning Rowel Mercado Mercado, licence 200900577, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 42
PartiesNMS v Mercado
Decided1 October 2020
Licensed immigration adviserRowel Mercado Mercado, licence 200900577, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Negligence / residence under skilled migrant category / complainant a manager at one company and a personal assistant (PA) at another company / adviser advised arrangement acceptable provided there was an outsourcing agreement / work visa sought & granted limited to PA role so residence declined / whether adviser negligent in advising complainant she could undertake work for two companies on visa limited to one company / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 / adviser should have known outsourcing agreement not acceptable / no reasonable basis for adviser to believe complainant just doing PA work / a professional adviser would not have advised arrangement would meet visa condition / high degree of carelessness & serious consequences for complainant / disciplinary threshold met / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 42 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Rowel Mercado Mercado (licence 200900577, current). See the full licence history on their profile.

Sources