The decision
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Decision maker | Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Citation | [2020] NZIACDT 37 |
| Parties | TTD v Zheng |
| Decided | 7 September 2020 |
| Licensed immigration adviser | Cheng Zheng, licence 201300486, current |
The Tribunal's published summary
“Dishonest or misleading behaviour / student visa / adviser filed with INZ letter from complainant’s employer to INZ falsely stating she had been granted leave to study in New Zealand and her position would be kept open / whether adviser knew complainant had already resigned at time of filing letter with INZ / whether adviser’s explanation to INZ honest / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl31 / adviser’s conduct in guiding complainant to compile letter suspicious but no evidence refuting he did not know complainant had resigned before sending letter / false explanation given by adviser to INZ / professional person need not resign on knowing evidence filed false, but expected to help check by providing honest explanation to INZ / adviser should have terminated instructions instead of sending letter with false statement / complaint upheld.”
The licensed immigration adviser in this decision
This decision concerns Cheng Zheng (licence 201300486, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.
Go to the Immigration Advisers Authority, which may refer them to the Tribunal.