This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 35, NZQA (Seavor-Cross) v Jin (Oulu Jin)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 7 August 2020, concerning Oulu Jin, licence 201700957, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 35
PartiesNZQA (Seavor-Cross) v Jin
Decided7 August 2020
Licensed immigration adviserOulu Jin, licence 201700957, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Dishonest or misleading behaviour / fabrication of academic transcript / essential skills work visa / adviser created course content document inserting school’s logo & a footer in order to speed up client’s application / document designed to look authentic & filed with NZQA / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl31a / form not its contents false / adviser’s conduct dishonest & misleading / adviser not motivated by personal gain but no defence / complaint upheld. Dishonest or misleading behaviour / fabrication of academic transcript / essential skills work visa / adviser created course content document inserting school’s logo & a footer in order to speed up client’s application / document designed to look authentic & filed with NZQA / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl31a / form not its contents false / adviser’s conduct dishonest & misleading / adviser not motivated by personal gain but no defence / complaint upheld.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 35 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Oulu Jin (licence 201700957, current). See the full licence history on their profile.

Sources