This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2020] NZIACDT 29, Immigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty (Caitlin Maree Penty)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 6 July 2020, concerning Caitlin Maree Penty, licence 201700510, surrendered.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2020] NZIACDT 29
PartiesImmigration New Zealand (Carley) v Penty
Decided6 July 2020
Licensed immigration adviserCaitlin Maree Penty, licence 201700510, surrendered

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / adviser took over arrangement with offshore company to provide immigration services to Filipino workers / system encouraged clients to deal with unlicensed persons / adviser failed to engage with clients / work carried out by staff amounted to immigration advice / previous complaint upheld regarding same arrangement / lack of written agreement with client / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / rubber stamping a serious professional violation / adviser’s conduct not deliberate / adviser misunderstood scope of clerical work / adviser failed to engage with clients even after complaint had been made / misconduct continued after warning from INZ / adviser no longer licensed / financial penalties involve punishment but also deterrence / misconduct serious & systemic / adviser censured & ordered to pay $5000 penalty.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2020] NZIACDT 29 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Caitlin Maree Penty (licence 201700510, surrendered). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources