[2020] NZIACDT 28 — XA v Hill (Jennifer Ann Hill)

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 29 June 2020 · adviser: Jennifer Ann Hill

The tribunal's published summary

Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / failure to have written agreement / adviser did not personally engage with complainant / adviser failed to exercise due diligence & care / incorrect information provided to INZ as to complainant’s work experience / almost $65,000 claimed in compensation / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / no remorse, no apology & no apparent learning from wrongdoing by adviser / offloading client engagement to unlicensed person a serious breach / adviser a completely silent partner in relationship / filing incorrect information without checking it led to INZ’s adverse finding / adviser not to blame for INZ’s unjustified character finding / multiple breaches of Code / not the most serious form of rubber stamping / losses claimed did not arise from adviser’s professional violations / complainant suffered distress / adviser directed to complete further training / adviser censured & ordered to pay 2,500 financial penalty & $2,000 in emotional compens…

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.