[2020] NZIACDT 22 — NJUM v VOLE

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal · decided 2 June 2020

The tribunal's published summary

Dishonest or misleading conduct / lack of diligence & due care / complainant married husband twice, once in Samoa & again in New Zealand / adviser advised complainant to conceal Samoan marriage in application / adviser as JP certified police certificate before sighting it, then presented to INZ / adviser filed applications without necessary documents / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / concealing marriage serious misconduct but not most egregious seen by tribunal / marriage genuine / no exploitation of vulnerable client / adviser perpetuating lies previously told by clients / adviser not driven by personal gain / certifying document of lesser gravity / document genuine / obligations concerning documents & file management not minor / adviser’s rehabilitation & personal circumstances favoured temporary removal / adviser censured, directed to take refresher course & suspended for 6 months / adviser ordered to pay $2,500 penalty & $7,465 refund of fees to complainant.

Read the full decision (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

This page reproduces the tribunal's own published summary as a fair report of public tribunal proceedings; the linked decision is the authoritative record. A decision is not itself a finding of wrongdoing — some complaints are dismissed. Complainants are anonymised by the tribunal. Complaints about advisers go to the Immigration Advisers Authority.