This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 9, Singh v Golian (Harjeet Singh Golian)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 19 February 2019, concerning Harjeet Singh Golian, licence 200800540, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 9
PartiesSingh v Golian
Decided19 February 2019
Licensed immigration adviserHarjeet Singh Golian, licence 200800540, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / failure to perform services with due care, diligence and professionalism / client’s work visa declined so client in New Zealand unlawfully / application for exception to immigration instructions under s61 / adviser recommended making formal complaint to INZ & appealing deportation on humanitarian grounds but both declined / adviser then advised client to lodge a request for student visa / Tribunal found adviser’s approach misguided & devoid of merit / strategy costly & compromised client’s prospects of success / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / breach not an isolated error of judgement / adviser lacked sufficient knowledge & skill / financial penalty not necessary in public interest / fees paid & cost of appeal wasted / no compensation recoverable as living expenses & costs of another adviser did not flow from unprofessional advice / adviser ordered to complete training & refund fees of $2,900.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 9 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Harjeet Singh Golian (licence 200800540, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources