This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 10, Mhatre v Gokhale (Neha Gokhale)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 22 February 2019, concerning Neha Gokhale, licence 201401348, expired.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 10
PartiesMhatre v Gokhale
Decided22 February 2019
Licensed immigration adviserNeha Gokhale, licence 201401348, expired

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / partnership based temporary visa application / adviser mistakenly lodged online application for another type of visa / paper application for correct visa type returned for being incomplete as missing supporting form signed by wife / adviser failed to provide written updates or keep written record / adviser had not kept copies of application on her file / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser’s violation at lower end of scale / error in selecting visa type simple mistake & did not amount to violation of standards / compensation for losses not attributable to adviser’s breaches / adviser cautioned.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 10 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Neha Gokhale (licence 201401348, expired). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Auckland.

Sources