This site is in beta. We are still smoothing out rough edges. If you spot something wrong or have a suggestion, tell us on the contact page.

[2019] NZIACDT 79, INZ (Gilray) v Croxson (Peter John Croxson)

A decision of the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, decided 9 December 2019, concerning Peter John Croxson, licence 200900548, current.

The Tribunal's published summary, reproduced as issued.

The decision

The decision at a glance
FactDetail
Decision makerImmigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal
Citation[2019] NZIACDT 79
PartiesINZ (Gilray) v Croxson
Decided9 December 2019
Licensed immigration adviserPeter John Croxson, licence 200900548, current

The Tribunal's published summary

“Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / adviser had no direct communication with clients / adviser engaged by offshore immigration consultancy which had been engaged by recruiting agency in another country / adviser mistakenly believed consultancy was his client / failure to have written agreement / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl17, cl18 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / delegation of immigration advice work to unlicensed people a serious infringement / not the most egregious example of rubber stamping as adviser still compiled application and supporting documentation / not a deliberate flouting of obligations / adviser accepted wrongdoing & put in place new practices to ensure obligations met / adviser censured & ordered to pay $3000 penalty.”

Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, [2019] NZIACDT 79 (PDF, Ministry of Justice)

The licensed immigration adviser in this decision

This decision concerns Peter John Croxson (licence 200900548, current). See the full licence history on their profile, or compare all licensed immigration advisers in Christchurch.

Sources